Skip to main content

Hiatus

Yes, a gap, quite a long gap between the last post and this one. There has been a hiatus in our thinking as well. The dominant topic has been Trump. Of course!

I watched an episode of Keiser Report on Aljazeera. What was particularly interesting was an interview with Michael Krieger of libertyblitzkrieg.com. He voiced his disatisfaction with the commentariat's views on Trump and spoke about the work of Ken Wilber and Spiral Dynamics.

You can read more of Krieger here:

https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2017/02/08/how-a-breakdown-in-liberal-ideology-created-trump-part-1/

Here is a link to Wilber's piece on Trump:

https://integrallife.com/trump-post-truth-world/

The substance of this position, an integral one is the following:

"The election of Donald Trump is an evolutionary self-correction that has been decades in the making — a backlash against the failure of the leading edge of consciousness (postmodernism and pluralism) to acknowledge the lie underlying the progress they’ve pursued: it’s not equal, it’s not consistent, and it doesn’t make room for everyone. But a new integral force is emerging that can move beyond the narcissism and nihilism of political correctness to offer genuine leadership and move towards a developmental-based wisdom of greater wholeness." (https://integrallife.com/trump-post-truth-world/)

The point of this, this myth, is that in evolutionary terms, a new model will arise that will be superior to what preceded it. It will have more explanatory force and it will be all encompassing. That's to say it will consist of the best of previous models and supersede them.

But all of this misses the point. There is no deficiency in current psychosocial and economic models. What Trump represents and instantiates is a regression.  Fukuyama is very perceptive in this context:

https://aeon.co/essays/was-francis-fukuyama-the-first-man-to-see-trump-coming?utm_source=Aeon+Newsletter&utm_campaign=9b1a683914-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_03_21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_411a82e59d-9b1a683914-69050461

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sort of

There is a moving essay on the philosopher Daniel Dennett, in a recent New Yorker. It's by Joshua Rothman. This excerpt is near the end: "Then, late last year, my mother had a catastrophic stroke. It devastated the left side of her brain, wrecking her parietal and temporal lobes and Broca’s area—parts of the brain that are involved in the emotions, the senses, memory, and speech. My mother now appears to be living in an eternal present. She can say only two words, “water” and “time.” She is present in the room—she looks me in the eye—but is capable of only fleeting recognition; she knows only that I am someone she should recognize. She grasps the world, but lightly. As I spent time with my mother, I found that my intuitions were shifting to Dennett’s side of the field. It seems natural to say that she “sort of” thinks, knows, cares, remembers, and understands, and that she is “sort of” conscious. It seems obvious that there is no “light switch” for consciousness: she is ...

The brain

  The brain has become everyone's subject, perhaps because evidence for an afterlife or a godlike creator stubbornly refuses to reveal itself.  (and perhaps Psychoanalysis is another god that failed ) The human brain is now thought to contain the answers we have failed to find elsewhere. Neuroscience will explain our emotional responses as well as our problem solving abilities and our indefatigablecuriosity.    Purpose, however, may remain the domain of philosophy. Eagelman emphasises the unconscious functioning which determines most of our actions and decisions, and acknowledges Freud's insight that much of behaviour is a product of unseen mental processes. The concept of extended mind, whereby external stimuli and exchanges with other minds enables broader conceptualising capacity and creativity that an isolated human could not achieve, may in turn be extended by AI into some new more complex form of mind. One can choose to greet this news with optimism, as heralding a leap f...

Mind

Is consciousness just an illusion? Cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett believes the human brain might not be that special. Is the human brain really just a collection of complex machines? http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39482345