Skip to main content

The brain

By
51ehV2UqFkL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

 

The brain has become everyone's subject, perhaps because evidence for an afterlife or a godlike creator stubbornly refuses to reveal itself.  (and perhaps Psychoanalysis is another god that failed )

The human brain is now thought to contain the answers we have failed to find elsewhere.

Neuroscience will explain our emotional responses as well as our problem solving abilities and our indefatigablecuriosity.    Purpose, however, may remain the domain of philosophy.

Eagelman emphasises the unconscious functioning which determines most of our actions and decisions, and acknowledges Freud's insight that much of behaviour is a product of unseen mental processes.

The concept of extended mind, whereby external stimuli and exchanges with other minds enables broader conceptualising capacity and creativity that an isolated human could not achieve, may in turn be extended by AI into some new more complex form of mind.

One can choose to greet this news with optimism, as heralding a leap forward for humanity that overcomes our present limitations, or with pessimism, seeing instead the prospect of a restored slavery, as robots decide what humans may or may not do, think and feel.  Eagelman is an optimist: ' We can hack our own hardware, and as a result our brains don't need to remain as we've inherited them.'

As an introduction (with an accompanying DVD) 'The Brain The story of You' by neuroscientist David Eagelman makes fascinating reading.

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sort of

By
There is a moving essay on the philosopher Daniel Dennett, in a recent New Yorker. It's by Joshua Rothman. This excerpt is near the end: "Then, late last year, my mother had a catastrophic stroke. It devastated the left side of her brain, wrecking her parietal and temporal lobes and Broca’s area—parts of the brain that are involved in the emotions, the senses, memory, and speech. My mother now appears to be living in an eternal present. She can say only two words, “water” and “time.” She is present in the room—she looks me in the eye—but is capable of only fleeting recognition; she knows only that I am someone she should recognize. She grasps the world, but lightly. As I spent time with my mother, I found that my intuitions were shifting to Dennett’s side of the field. It seems natural to say that she “sort of” thinks, knows, cares, remembers, and understands, and that she is “sort of” conscious. It seems obvious that there is no “light switch” for consciousness: she is ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mind

By
Is consciousness just an illusion? Cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett believes the human brain might not be that special. Is the human brain really just a collection of complex machines? http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39482345
Post a Comment
Read more